ArticleCardiology research and practice2026
Multidetector Computed Tomography Findings of Myocardial Bridge and Its Relationship With Coronary Calcification.
Article in Cardiology research and practice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Coronary Artery Anomalies and Anatomical Variants: Cross-Sectional Diagnostic Imaging and Clinical Background.Journal of imaging · 2026Review
- Multidetector Computed Tomography Findings of Myocardial Bridge and Its Relationship With Coronary Calcification.Cardiology research and practice · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence and anatomical characteristics of myocardial bridge (MB) using multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) and to investigate its relationship with coronary artery calcification and atherosclerotic burden. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 7024 patients who underwent MDCT for cardiac complaints between November 2010 and December 2020. The length and thickness of MBs were measured, and coronary calcification was quantified using the Agatston score. Patients were categorized according to the degree of coronary stenosis (< 50% or ≥ 50%) to assess the association between MB and calcification severity. Results: The prevalence of MB was 7.7% (542 patients). The most common complaints in patients with MB were atypical chest pain (76%) and stable angina (24%). MB was most commonly detected in the middle segment of the LAD artery (65.68%). Mild atherosclerotic plaque (31%), moderate atherosclerotic plaque (13%), and severe atherosclerotic plaque and stenosis (5%) were present in 51% of patients with MB. Significant calcification was found in 23% of MB patients, who had higher calcification scores, particularly those with coronary artery stenosis greater than 50%. Conclusions: MDCT serves as an effective noninvasive method not only for detecting MB but also for evaluating concomitant coronary calcification and early atherosclerotic changes. Early identification of calcification in MB patients may guide individualized cardiovascular assessment, focusing on noninvasive imaging, risk factor control, and preventive therapy similar to standard protocols for atherosclerosis management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.