ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
An exploratory analysis of ACNS electroencephalography patterns in 34 comatose patients after in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aims to evaluate the prognostic value of electroencephalogram (EEG) patterns in comatose patients after in-hospital adult cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Methods: Clinical and EEG data were retrospectively collected from 34 patients who underwent in-hospital CPR. The EEG data were classified into seven patterns according to the terminology defined by the 2021 American Clinical Neurophysiology Society (ACNS). All patients were further categorized into distinct groups based on their EEG characteristics, including background frequency and EEG categorization. The outcome of patients at discharge was assessed using the Glasgow Outcome Score (GOS) as 1-2 (poor) or 3-5 (good). Baseline characteristics and EEG patterns were compared between the outcome groups. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to evaluate the predictive performance of the EEG background frequency and EEG categorization. Differences in the area under the curve (AUC) were compared using the DeLong test. Results: This study included 34 patients who underwent in-hospital CPR. Patients with poor outcomes had lower GCS scores [3.0 (interquartile range, 3.0-4.0) vs. 6.0 (interquartile range, 3.0-7.0), Conclusion: The 2021 version of the ACNS standardized terminology to analyze EEG patterns is useful for predicting the prognosis of comatose patients following CPR. Our preliminary findings suggest a potential association between EEG patterns and neurological outcomes, although this finding requires further validation in larger prospective studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.