Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41502426›Full record

ReviewAnnals of translational medicine2025

Ovine models of intervertebral disc degeneration.

Andres F Bonilla, Howard B Seim, Ben Gadomski, Vikas V Patel, Jeremiah T Easley

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of translational medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Andres F BonillaDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4593-3173
Howard B SeimDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
Ben GadomskiDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.
Vikas V PatelDepartment of Orthopedics, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA.
Jeremiah T EasleyDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development and evaluation of effective therapeutic strategies for intervertebral disc degeneration (IVDD) and their successful incorporation into clinical practice remain challenging, largely due to the absence of an optimal preclinical animal model. While both induced and spontaneous IVDD animal models have provided valuable insights, they also present inherent limitations that restrict their translational applicability. Increasing evidence supports the use of sheep as a highly relevant large animal model, as spontaneous spine disorders in this species closely mirror many features of human IVDD. Sheep exhibit remarkable similarities to humans in terms of disc cellular composition, anatomical configuration, physiological loading, histological architecture, and molecular signaling pathways. These features make the ovine model uniquely positioned to bridge the gap between basic science and clinical translation, fulfilling both scientific and regulatory requirements. In this review, we highlight the shared features of IVDD between sheep and humans and examine both spontaneous and induced ovine models currently used to study disc degeneration. Furthermore, we discuss how the integration of advanced technologies, such as surgical navigation systems can refine the reproducibility and precision of these models. These innovations not only enhance experimental rigor but also strengthen the translational value of the ovine model, advancing our understanding of IVDD pathophysiology, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment. Continued refinement of ovine models will play a critical role in the development of effective therapeutic strategies for managing IVDD in humans.

Indexed as

animal modelssheepSpine

Identifiers

PMID41502426
PMCPMC12771051

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.