ReviewJPRAS open2026
Clinical features, evaluation, and management of speech and swallow complications of facial paralysis: A scoping review.
Review in JPRAS open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Relationship Between Facial Motor Impairment, Swallowing Function and Oral Motor Dysfunction in Patients with Post-Stroke Central Facial Paralysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Facial paralysis may lead to complications such as dysarthria, oral residue during deglutition, dysphagia, and sialorrhea. Literature regarding the assessment and treatment of these complications in patients with facial paralysis has historically been limited. However, there continues to be new evidence in this field that aims to fill the gaps in our current understanding of this condition and its implications for patients. The primary aim of this study was to analyze the current literature regarding the effect of facial paralysis on speech and oral competence, discuss treatment options, and assess implications for the future. Data Sources: Ovid® Medline ALL, Ovid Embase, and Cochrane Library from Wiley. Review methods: A scoping review of the literature was conducted to investigate the effects of facial paralysis on speech and oral competence, as well as current evaluation and treatment methods in adult populations. Studies were assessed based on set inclusion criteria relevant to the goals of the review. Conclusion: Facial paralysis may lead to various speech and swallowing challenges. Numerous assessment tools and treatment options exist for facial paralysis, however, evidence regarding their effectiveness in managing oral complications is limited. Implications for practice: There is a need for consideration as well as standardization of the effect of facial paralysis on speech, swallowing, and saliva management. It may be reasonable to consider the inclusion of a speech language pathologist on the care team allowing for the early assessment of oral complications related to communication and deglutition. Additionally, there is need for both subjective and objective evaluation methods throughout the care timeline. Utilizing a broader interdisciplinary approach to management could potentially improve both patient outcomes and experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.