ArticleActa chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca2026
[Seeking a New Radiological Measure to Predict Rotator Cuff Tears: Investigating the Coracoclavicular Distance in an MRI-Based Study].
Article in Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of the studyRotator cuff tears are a common disease and various radiological measurement methods are still being investigated to make the diagnosis. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the coracoclavicular distance is associated with rotator cuff tears. MATERIAL AND
methodsShoulder magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations of 101 patients who underwent shoulder arthroscopy due to rotator cuff tears and 158 patients with normal MRI findings were evaluated retrospectively. Coracohumeral distance, acromiohumeral distance and supraspinatus volume were measured.
resultsWhen the acromiohumeral distance, coracoclavicular distance and supraspinatus volume were compared between the groups, each measurement was found to be statistically significantly lower in the tear group (Group 2) (p<0.001). In the analysis of ROC for the detection of full-thickness supraspinatus tear, the following findings were observed: if the coracoclavicular distance measured less than 12.4mm, a sensitivity of 89% and specificity of 73% were determined. Similarly, if the acromiohumeral distance measured less than 7.5mm, a sensitivity of 73% and specificity of 84% were determined. In full-thickness supraspinatus tears, if the supraspinatus volume measured below 51 cm3, a sensitivity of 89% and specificity of 72% were determined.
conclusionsOur study, conducted on a limited population, demonstrated that coracoclavicular distance is a significant metric for detecting supraspinatus tears. We believe that we have identified a new parameter that may be useful in the diagnosis of rotator cuff tears.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41502414What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.