Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41502381›Full record

ReviewActa chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca2026

[Surgical Treatment of a Posterior Malleolus Fracture: Literature Review].

Petr Kašák, Lukáš Čapek, Tomáš Beran

Abstract readReviewEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Acta chirurgiae orthopaedicae et traumatologiae Cechoslovaca, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Petr KašákOddeleni urgentni mediciny Krajske nemocnice Liberec, a.s.
Lukáš ČapekOddeleni biomechaniky Krajske nemocnice Liberec, a.s.
Tomáš BeranRadiodiagnosticke oddeleni Krajske nemocnice Liberec, a.s.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fractures of the posterior margin of the distal end of the tibia, also referred to as posterior malleolus fractures, represent an important but often underestimated component of ankle injuries. They are rarely isolated but rather occur as part of more complex fractures classified as Weber type B and C, or they accompany high-energy pilon tibial fractures and spiral fractures of the tibial shaft. In recent decades, there has been a significant shift in the understanding of biomechanical importance of the posterior malleolus, which plays a key role in maintaining the stability of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis and preserving the congruency of the ankle joint surface. Indications for surgical treatment as well as surgical approaches and fixation techniques have changed dramatically. This review article aims to summarize current knowledge of these fractures, with a focus on anatomy, diagnosis, classification, and particularly surgical treatment options, including the choice of approach and methods of fragment reduction. The literature search was conducted in the PubMed and Web of Science databases, focusing on publications released before the end of 2024. The search included the following keywords: "posterior malleolus fracture," "posterior tibial margin," "ankle fracture," "CT classification," "syndesmosis injury," and "surgical fixation." Original clinical studies, review articles, anatomical and biomechanical studies as well as case reports that provide clinically relevant information on the diagnosis and surgical management of these fractures were included in the review. The introduction of CT imaging has significantly contributed to a better understanding of the morphology of the posterior margin and led to the development of new classification systems (Haraguchi, Bartoníček and Rammelt, Mason), which serve as a guide in selecting the optimal surgical approach. Fixation of the posterior malleolus has a positive effect on ankle and syndesmotic stability even in small fragments. The choice of surgical approach is individualized - the posterolateral, posteromedial, transfibular, or modified lateral approach are used most commonly. Direct reduction and stabilization of the fragment allow for more accurate restoration of the joint surface and are associated with a lower risk of secondary displacement compared to indirect fixation. Surgical treatment of posterior tibial margin fractures should rely on a precise CT scan-based diagnosis and careful assessment of fracture morphology. Direct visualization, anatomical reduction, and fixation of the fragment provide better clinical and functional outcomes and should be preferred in displaced or complex fractures.

Indexed as

Ankle FracturesFracture Fixation, InternalTibial FracturesHumansankle fracturescomputed tomographyfracture fixationposterior malleolusposterior tibial marginreduction techniques.surgical approachessyndesmosis injurytibial fractures

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.