ArticleJournal of cosmetic dermatology2026
Relative Efficacy of Immunomodulatory Monotherapies for Psoriasis of the Scalp: A Network Meta-Analysis Study.
Article in Journal of cosmetic dermatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Relative Efficacy of Immunomodulatory Monotherapies for Psoriasis of the Scalp: A Network Meta-Analysis Study.Journal of cosmetic dermatology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRecently, the literature has expanded with peer-reviewed studies on immunomodulatory agents' efficacy on scalp psoriasis-which, in turn, widened knowledge gaps regarding these agents' relative effectiveness. We determined the relative efficacy of immunomodulatory monotherapies for scalp psoriasis.
methodsWe ran Bayesian network meta-analyses (NMAs) using outcomes related to Psoriasis Scalp Severity Index (PSSI) and scalp-specific Physician's Global Assessment of clear (0) or almost clear (1) (Sc-PGA 0/1).
resultsWe estimated the relative efficacy of 22 interventions (including placebo), and analyzed 9 outcomes, namely: proportion of participants who attained Sc-PGA 0/1, proportion of participants who achieved 100% improvement in PSSI (PSSI-100), and proportion of participants who achieved 90% improvement in PSSI (PSSI-90) at 8, 12, and 16 weeks.
conclusionsWe are the first to provide comparative evidence on the efficacy of newly investigated agents such as deucravacitinib, tildrakizumab, roflumilast and icotrokinra. In general, the IL-17 inhibitors (bimekizumab, ixekizumab, secukinumab, brodalumab) and IL-23 inhibitors (icotrokinra, guselkumab, tildrakizumab) were effective depending upon the outcome and time-point being considered. At 16 weeks, for PSSI-100, ixekizumab 150 mg at weeks 0, 2, 4, 8, and 12 ranked highest; at 16 weeks, for Sc-PGA 0/1 bimekizumab 320 mg every 4 weeks ranked highest; at 8 weeks, for PSSI-100 ixekizumab 80 mg every 2 weeks ranked highest; at 8 weeks, for Sc-PGA 0/1 secukinumab 300 mg at weeks 1, 2, 3 and then every 4 weeks ranked highest. Small-molecule therapies (apremilast, deucravacitinib, roflumilast) improved scalp psoriasis modestly. Our work would guide the design of future studies and clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.