Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41502072›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied clinical medical physics2026

Initial experience with remote MRI scanning support in an oncology focused practice: Opportunities for expanded access to radiology care.

Christopher M Walker, Maria G Maldonado, Megan C Jacobsen, Suprateek Kundu, Michelle L Underwood, Joshua P Yung, Brandy J Reed, David Jaffray, R Jason Stafford, Marshall E Hicks and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied clinical medical physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Christopher M WalkerDepartment of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6381-8737
Maria G MaldonadoDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-1235-551X
Megan C JacobsenDepartment of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1757-3628
Suprateek KunduDepartment of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Michelle L UnderwoodDiagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Joshua P YungDepartment of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3752-5997
Brandy J ReedDiagnostic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
David JaffrayRadiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
R Jason StaffordDepartment of Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Marshall E HicksInterventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Caroline ChungRadiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.
Aradhana M VenkatesanDepartment of Abdominal Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5033-0820

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs medical imaging demand grows, there is increasing stress on the currently available workforce to deliver consistent, high-quality imaging studies while ensuring rapid study turnaround times and round-the-clock radiology coverage. Advances in remote access technology facilitating remote scan assistance and control are now commercially available to address these pressing clinical needs.

methodsThis work evaluated an early clinical application of a virtual scanner operations system (syngo Virtual Cockpit (VA13A, Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany) for remote magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) monitoring and scan control at three geographically distant outpatient sites associated with our primary institution.

resultsThe system facilitated execution of technically complex oncologic MRI exams at these geographically distant clinics with no measurable impact on acquisition time compared to MR imaging performed at our primary hospital location. Additional operational improvements were realized with the use of the system, including remote staff training, technical assistance, and scanning during staff shortages. This early iteration of remote scanning had some limitations including limited utility for additional assistance in the scanning of those protocols that require complex physical setup. Moreover, connectivity issues were noted to be a limiting factor that contributed to operational delays. It was still necessary to have an onsite MRI technologist at the scanner console to interface with the patient and ensure safe operation.

conclusionDespite these limitations, our initial experience demonstrates that the use of remote MRI scanning support facilitates staffing flexibility while providing expanded patient access to oncology MRI services.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityMagnetic Resonance ImagingMedical OncologyNeoplasmsHumansmagnetic resonance imagingpractice expansionremote scanningtechnologytool evaluationworkforce

Identifiers

PMID41502072
PMCPMC12779931

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.