ArticleMolecular biology and evolution2026
Estimating the Reduction in Genetic Diversity from Background Selection under Non-equilibrium Demography and Partial Selfing.
Article in Molecular biology and evolution, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evolution of quantitative traits with background selection.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- ThebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Estimating the Reduction in Genetic Diversity from Background Selection under Non-equilibrium Demography and Partial Selfing.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026Article
- A model for background selection in non-equilibrium populations.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The effect of natural selection on linked sites has been suggested to be a major determinant of genetic diversity. While it is in principle possible to estimate this effect from genome sequence data, interactions between selection, demography and inbreeding are expected to make inference less reliable. Here, we investigate whether the genome-wide reduction in diversity due to background selection (B¯) can be accurately estimated when populations are at demographic non-equilibrium and/or reproduce by partial self-fertilization. We show that the classic-BGS model is surprisingly robust to both demographic non-equilibrium and low rates of selfing, although both processes do lead to biased estimation of the distribution of fitness effects (DFE) of deleterious mutations. A high rate of selfing leads to poor estimation of both B¯ and DFE parameters. We propose an alternative approach where background selection, demography and partial selfing are jointly estimated from windowed site frequency spectra. This approach resolves most of the bias observed under the classic-BGS model and can also generate estimates of past demography that account for the effect of background selection and partial selfing. We apply the approach to genome sequence data from Capsella grandiflora and Capsella orientalis, which have contrasting mating systems and display a forty-fold difference in nucleotide diversity. Our results suggest that background selection has a weak effect on levels of genetic diversity in the outcrosser C. grandiflora (B¯=0.89) and a more substantial effect in the predominantly selfing species C. orientalis (B¯=0.44), but that background selection alone cannot explain their disparity in genetic diversity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.