Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41501933›Full record

ArticleBMC psychology2026

Unpacking the relationship between self-control and academic engagement: the mediating role of meaning in life and the moderating role of GenAI dependence.

Xi Chen, Mingyue Cui, Pu Sun, Xiaohong Xu, Ke Ma, Ling Yan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xi ChenDepartment of Psychology and Education, Capital University of Physical Education and Sports, Beijing, 100191, China.
Mingyue CuiDepartment of Psychology and Education, Capital University of Physical Education and Sports, Beijing, 100191, China.
Pu SunDepartment of Psychology and Education, Capital University of Physical Education and Sports, Beijing, 100191, China.
Xiaohong XuDepartment of Psychology and Education, Capital University of Physical Education and Sports, Beijing, 100191, China.
Ke MaSchool of Physical Education and Training, Capital University of Physical Education and Sports, Beijing, 100191, China.
Ling YanDepartment of Psychology and Education, Capital University of Physical Education and Sports, Beijing, 100191, China. yanling@cupes.edu.cn.

Funding

China-Montenegro Science and Technology Cooperation Committee "China-Montenegro National Report on Physical Literacy for Children and Adolescents in Schools" Project 4-2Science and Technology School Strengthen Project of CUPES 155225002/009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith the rapid integration of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) into higher education, understanding how technology shapes students’ psychological motivation has become increasingly critical. Self-control is widely recognized as a core internal resource that sustains academic engagement, yet little is known about how this self-regulatory capacity operates when external technological reliance intervenes in learning. Addressing this gap, the present study introduces an innovative framework that integrates Self-Determination Theory (SDT) and Path Dependence Theory (PDT) to examine how meaning in life—defined as individuals’ perceived sense of purpose, coherence, and value in life—mediates the relationship between self-control and academic engagement, and how GenAI dependence moderates this pathway. This approach provides a novel perspective on the interaction between inner volitional strength and external technological dependence in shaping academic motivation.

methodA cross-sectional survey was conducted among 1,139 university students in China. Validated self-report questionnaires were used to assess self-control, meaning in life, GenAI dependence, and academic engagement. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was performed using Mplus 8.3 to construct latent variables and test the hypothesized moderated mediation model.

resultsThe findings indicated that self-control significantly predicted academic engagement. Meaning in life partially mediated this relationship. Furthermore, GenAI dependence negatively moderated the pathway from self-control to meaning in life—specifically, the positive effect of self-control on meaning in life was weaker among students with higher GenAI dependence. These results reveal a dynamic interaction between internal psychological strengths and external technological reliance in shaping academic engagement.

conclusionThis study proposes and validates a novel moderated mediation mechanism linking self-control, meaning in life, and academic engagement within the emerging context of AI-augmented learning. By integrating motivational and technological perspectives, it contributes a new theoretical model of “motivational regulation under technological mediation.” Practically, the findings underscore the dual importance of cultivating students’ self-regulation and existential meaning-making capacity while promoting reflective and autonomous GenAI use. These insights offer evidence-based guidance for fostering sustainable academic motivation and psychological well-being in digitalized higher education environments.

Indexed as

MotivationSelf-ControlStudentsAcademiaAdultChinaCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGenerative Artificial IntelligenceHumansMaleUniversitiesYoung AdultAcademic engagementGenAI dependenceMeaning in lifeSelf-Control

Identifiers

PMID41501933
PMCPMC12870236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.