ArticleActa veterinaria Scandinavica2026
Maintaining animal-source food production in conflict zones: lessons from Ukraine.
Article in Acta veterinaria Scandinavica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Resilience Ontologies in Veterinary Science: How They Shape the Way We Address Resilience.Veterinary sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe deteriorating security situation in Europe's immediate neighbourhood has underscored the importance of safeguarding food systems during conflict. Animal-sourced foods are essential for human nutrition and play a critical role in maintaining national resilience, yet their production becomes highly vulnerable in wartime. This study explores the resilience of Ukrainian animal-sourced food systems following the 2022 Russian invasion, focusing on the perspectives of farmers and veterinarians.
resultsThrough 18 in-depth interviews with farmers and veterinarians across occupied and non-occupied regions, the study examines perceived challenges, adaptive strategies, and preparedness levels. Respondents reported severe disruptions, especially in occupied areas, including breakdowns in feed supply chains, delivery of medicines and other essential logistics, prolonged power cuts, reduced livestock production, livestock losses, and staff shortages. Adaptation strategies ranged from diversification to increased self-sufficiency, though outcomes varied widely. The absence of crisis preparedness plans led to improvised responses in the early stages of the conflict. Interviewees highlighted key factors for strengthening livestock and food system resilience during crises, emphasizing human resources, technical preparedness, and contingency planning.
conclusionsThe findings of this study highlight the importance of preparatory planning, resource reserves, skilled personnel, and support networks. The experiences of Ukrainian farmers and veterinarians provide important insights into how agricultural systems can become more adaptive and responsive during future crises, emphasizing the need for flexibility, preparedness, and community collaboration. However, further research encompassing a wider geographic scope and a broader range of stakeholders is needed to validate these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.