ArticleTrials2026
Avoiding routine gastric residual volume measurement in neonatal critical care (the neoGASTRIC trial): study protocol for a multi-centre, unblinded, randomised, controlled trial.
Article in Trials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Enteral feeding practices and guideline adherence for very low birth weight infants in Chinese NICUs: a multicentre cross-sectional survey.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
40 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundRoutine measurement of gastric residual volumes involves regularly aspirating the entire stomach contents to assess the volume and colour of the aspirate to inform feeding. This is an established practice in many United Kingdom and Australian neonatal units for preterm infants receiving gastric tube feeds. The rationale is to assess feed tolerance and to predict and potentially prevent necrotising enterocolitis, a serious gut condition. Routine measurement of gastric residual volumes may also be associated with adverse outcomes and harm, including delayed achievement of full enteral feeds and longer neonatal unit stay. Evidence to support the routine measurement of gastric residuals is poor, and previous small trials have not been generalisable to UK or Australian neonatal care.
methodsThe aim of the neoGASTRIC trial is to test whether avoiding routine measurement of gastric residual volumes in preterm infants reduces the time taken for an infant to reach full enteral feeds without increasing necrotising enterocolitis. neoGASTRIC is an individually randomised controlled trial in neonatal units in the UK and Australia. A target of 7040 infants born before 34 weeks' gestation will be randomly allocated, prior to receiving 24 h of enteral feeds > 15 ml/kg/day, on a 1:1 basis to have no routine gastric residual volumes measured, or to have gastric residual volumes measured routinely. Opt-out consent will be used with parent and staff views explored as part of an embedded process evaluation. The primary superiority outcome is time to reach full milk feeds ≥ 145 ml/kg/day for three consecutive days. Bell's stage 2 or 3 necrotising enterocolitis following blinded adjudication will be the key secondary, non-inferiority safety outcome. Other neonatal core outcomes and health care resource use and costs prior to discharge will be evaluated. DISCUSSION: neoGASTRIC will address a research priority that affects more than 20,000 preterm infants in the United Kingdom and Australia annually. Even modest improvements in clinical outcomes and resource use could result in large clinical benefits and savings at a population level.
trial registrationISRCTN 16710849 . Prospectively registered on 8 February 2023.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.