Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41501908›Full record

ReviewJournal of translational medicine2026

IAPs in cancers: molecular mechanisms, clinical prognostic value, and translational therapeutic potential.

Zhisheng Teng, Liyun Teng, Jing Xie

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of translational medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Zhisheng TengDepartment of Head and Neck Surgery, Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou Institute of Medicine (HIM), Chinese Academy of Sciences, Hangzhou, China.
Liyun TengDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Chinese Medicine Hospital of Yongjia County, Wenzhou, China. 714304393@qq.com.
Jing XieDepartment of Stomatology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China. xiejing@wmu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConventional therapies remain the primary approach for most cancers but typically achieve only modest improvements in prognosis. With the rapid advances in molecular biology and multi-omics technologies, targeted therapy has become the first choice for treating advanced cancer. Among these, inhibitor of apoptosis proteins (IAPs) has emerged as critical regulators in both experimental and clinical studies. MAIN BODY: Nevertheless, several challenges persist, including tumor heterogeneity across cancer types, adverse effects associated with IAPs inhibitors (such as cytokine release and inflammation), and the lack of validated biomarkers for patient selection. With the development of artificial intelligence and precision medicine, IAP-targeted therapy, especially in combination with other therapies, has shown favorable clinical application potential.

conclusionsThis review systematically summarizes the structural domains, molecular functions, biological processes, clinical relevance, and advances in drug development and translational applications of IAPs, aiming to refine therapeutic strategies and facilitate clinical translation.

Indexed as

Inhibitor of Apoptosis ProteinsNeoplasmsTranslational Research, BiomedicalAnimalsHumansPrognosisInhibitor of Apoptosis ProteinsCell deathIAPs inhibitorsInhibitor of apoptosis proteins (IAPs)Innate and adaptive immunityUbiquitination

Identifiers

PMID41501908
PMCPMC12874686

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.