ArticleOne health outlook2026
Challenges and potential opportunities for improving One Health surveillance in low-resource settings: Insights from rabies surveillance in Malawi.
Article in One health outlook, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Does plastic waste present an infection hazard? Current evidence, surveillance challenges and research priorities.One health outlook · 2026Review
- Assessing Malawi's animal health surveillance system using the FAO surveillance evaluation tool: gaps, strengths, and opportunities for one health resilience.BMC veterinary research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The growing threat of zoonotic diseases has driven an increased interest in “One Health”, a framework that demands a more holistic approach to understanding, preventing and controlling the emergence and spread of health risks at the human-animal-environment interface. This approach requires systems that capture data across human, animal, and environmental health sectors. However, in resource-limited settings, critical actors, namely public health departments, veterinary services, and environmental monitoring agencies, are often underfunded and lack robust surveillance systems. Additionally, the absence of historical collaboration between these sectors often results in limited or nonexistent data sharing, further hindering effective disease monitoring and response. During a study on the epidemiology of human rabies and accessibility of post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) in Southern Malawi, we observed significant disparities in data management infrastructure between human and animal health sectors. Furthermore, there were significant challenges in data capturing, management, and sharing. These issues remain in practice largely because of the absence of digital and standardized data management systems, especially in the animal health sector, compounded by insufficient recognition of the importance of surveillance and its low prioritization in health strategies. This gap hinders the accurate reporting of diseases, disrupts resource allocation for prevention and control, and prevents countries from contributing to global disease records, thereby limiting international efforts to track and mitigate emerging infectious disease threats. To address these challenges, future efforts should consider standardizing record capture, improving data storage practices, leveraging existing technical capacities, promoting wide-scale use of electronic records, and developing intersectoral and interoperable information management systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.