Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41501903›Full record

ArticleOne health outlook2026

Challenges and potential opportunities for improving One Health surveillance in low-resource settings: Insights from rabies surveillance in Malawi.

Precious Innocent Mastala, Patrick Ken Kalonde, Enerst Chikhola, Jordana Burdon Bailey, Joseph Nkhoma, Frederic Lohr, Tamanda Hiwa, Bessie Phiri, Catherine Wood, Thoko Flav Kapalamula and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in One health outlook, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Precious Innocent MastalaMalawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Research Programme, Blantyre, Malawi. pmastala@mlw.mw.
Patrick Ken KalondeMalawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Research Programme, Blantyre, Malawi.
Enerst ChikholaIndependent Researcher, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Jordana Burdon BaileyMalawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Research Programme, Blantyre, Malawi.
Joseph NkhomaDepartment of Animal Health and Livestock Development, Central Veterinary Laboratory, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Frederic LohrMission Rabies/WVS, Dorset, England, UK.
Tamanda HiwaQueen Elizabeth Central Hospital, Blantyre, Malawi.
Bessie PhiriMalawi University of Science and Technology, Thyolo, Malawi.
Catherine WoodFaculty of Veterinary Medicine, Lilongwe University of Agriculture and Natural Resources, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Thoko Flav KapalamulaMalawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Research Programme, Blantyre, Malawi.
Fanuel BicktonMalawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Research Programme, Blantyre, Malawi.
Blessings ChiepaMalawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Research Programme, Blantyre, Malawi.
Hannah Joan JørgensenNorwegian Veterinary Institute, Oslo, Norway.
Stella Mazeri *The Roslin Institute and Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
Janelisa Musaya *Malawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Research Programme, Blantyre, Malawi. jmusaya@mlw.mw.

Funding

Malawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Programme 206545/Z/17/ZWellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The growing threat of zoonotic diseases has driven an increased interest in “One Health”, a framework that demands a more holistic approach to understanding, preventing and controlling the emergence and spread of health risks at the human-animal-environment interface. This approach requires systems that capture data across human, animal, and environmental health sectors. However, in resource-limited settings, critical actors, namely public health departments, veterinary services, and environmental monitoring agencies, are often underfunded and lack robust surveillance systems. Additionally, the absence of historical collaboration between these sectors often results in limited or nonexistent data sharing, further hindering effective disease monitoring and response. During a study on the epidemiology of human rabies and accessibility of post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) in Southern Malawi, we observed significant disparities in data management infrastructure between human and animal health sectors. Furthermore, there were significant challenges in data capturing, management, and sharing. These issues remain in practice largely because of the absence of digital and standardized data management systems, especially in the animal health sector, compounded by insufficient recognition of the importance of surveillance and its low prioritization in health strategies. This gap hinders the accurate reporting of diseases, disrupts resource allocation for prevention and control, and prevents countries from contributing to global disease records, thereby limiting international efforts to track and mitigate emerging infectious disease threats. To address these challenges, future efforts should consider standardizing record capture, improving data storage practices, leveraging existing technical capacities, promoting wide-scale use of electronic records, and developing intersectoral and interoperable information management systems.

Indexed as

Cross-sectoral collaborationData managementData qualityDisease surveillanceNeglected tropical diseasesOne healthRabiesResource-limited settings

Identifiers

PMID41501903
PMCPMC12829156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.