ArticleBMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation2026
Effect of different types of exercise in fibromyalgia syndrome: a network meta-analysis.
Article in BMC sports science, medicine & rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatients with fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) often exhibit poor health and reduced physical function. Exercise interventions can effectively alleviate symptoms and improve function. This study aims to systematically evaluate and compare the efficacy of different exercise interventions on the key clinical outcomes to identify the most effective modality and inform evidence-based exercise recommendations for patients with FMS.
methodsThis study conducted a systematic search of four databases: PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. The primary outcome measures included health status, pain intensity, the number of tender points (TP), and aerobic capacity. Stata 15.0 and R software were used for network meta-analysis (NMA), and the effect size and its 95% confidence interval were calculated using a random-effects model. The methodological quality of the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane RoB 2.0 tool and the TESTEX scale.
resultsStretching combined with balance training resulted in the greatest improvement in health status (MD = - 25.13; 95% CI [- 33.81, - 16.44]). For other symptom-related outcomes, aerobic exercise (AE) combined with strength and stretching showed the highest probability of alleviating pain intensity (MD = - 3.61; 95% CI [- 4.40, - 2.82]). AE alone was most effective in reducing the number of tender points (MD = - 2.28; 95% CI [- 3.57, - 1.00]), while whole-body vibration (WBV) produced the largest enhancement in aerobic capacity (MD = 55.0; 95% CI [26.14, 83.75]).
conclusionsStretching combined with balance training was found to be most effective in improving health status. AE combined with strength training and stretching demonstrated the greatest efficacy in reducing pain intensity, while AE was most effective in decreasing the number of tender points. WBV appeared to provide the largest improvement in aerobic capacity in patients with FMS. These findings suggest that healthcare providers should combine AE, strength, stretching, balance, WBV, and other exercises based on the individual circumstances of patients with FMS, while further high-quality RCTs are warranted to confirm these results and to standardize exercise protocols.
trial registrationCRD420251036473.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.