Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41501858›Full record

ReviewReproductive health2026

Gender equity and menstrual justice: a psychosocial review on stigma and discrimination in access to reproductive health.

Clara Selva, Mónica Natalia Butragueño, Carlota de Miquel

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Reproductive health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Clara SelvaEstudis de Psicologia i Ciències de l'Educació (EPCE), Universitat Oberta de Catalunya (UOC), Barcelona, Spain. cselvao@uoc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7390-9889
Mónica Natalia ButragueñoEstudis de Psicologia i Ciències de l'Educació (EPCE), Universitat Oberta de Catalunya (UOC), Barcelona, Spain.
Carlota de MiquelEstudis de Psicologia i Ciències de l'Educació (EPCE), Universitat Oberta de Catalunya (UOC), Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3602-4146

Funding

Universitat Oberta de Catalunya , España Research Accelerator (UOC-RA430)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe taboo and stigma surrounding menstruation remain deeply entrenched in diverse sociocultural contexts, generating significant inequalities in education, health, employment, and social participation. These barriers disproportionately affect individuals in vulnerable situations and are closely linked to what is known as menstrual poverty; defined as limited access to hygiene products, reliable information, and adequate water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) conditions. This review aims to critically analyse recent scientific literature on menstrual health and management, identifying key thematic areas, persistent inequalities, and proposed strategies across various social and geographical contexts.

methodsA narrative review was conducted of peer-reviewed literature published between 2019 and 2025 in international databases. From an initial pool of 905 records, 36 studies were selected based on pre-established inclusion and exclusion criteria. These studies employed diverse methodologies, including qualitative, quantitative, theoretical approaches, and literature reviews. The analysis was structured around six thematic axes: menstrual stigma, structural discrimination, menstrual poverty, media representations, labour legislation, and menstrual activism.

resultsThe reviewed studies demonstrate that menstrual stigma has a multidimensional impact, manifesting in social exclusion, medicalization of menstruating bodies, institutional neglect, and the persistence of discriminatory practices. Menstrual poverty, identified both in low-income and high-income settings, adversely affects the physical, emotional, and social well-being of menstruating individuals. Furthermore, the review highlights a lack of inclusive public policies, limited labour regulatory frameworks, and the reproduction of stigmatizing narratives in the media. Nevertheless, notable advances are emerging in the fields of activism, education, and legislative initiatives.

conclusionsThe findings underscore the urgent need to develop intersectional public policies that approach menstrual health through a human rights, gender equity, and social justice lens. The review advocates for strengthened menstrual literacy, improved access to menstrual products and appropriate infrastructure, and the integration of menstrual health into educational, healthcare, and workplace systems as a pathway to ensure a dignified, healthy, and equitable menstrual experience.

Indexed as

Gender EquityHealth Services AccessibilityMenstruationReproductive HealthSocial StigmaFemaleHumansPovertyDiscriminationLegislationMediaMenstrual activismMenstrual cycleMenstrual povertyMenstrual stigmaMenstruationWomen

Identifiers

PMID41501858
PMCPMC12853895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.