ArticleJournal of ovarian research2026
Investigating the association between systemic immune-inflammation index and female fertility: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in Journal of ovarian research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Age-Adjusted Associations Between Routine Systemic Inflammatory Markers and Anti-Müllerian Hormone in Reproductive-Age Women: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- The association between dietary acid load and endometriosis: a case-control study.BMC women's health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInflammation has been linked to female fertility, yet its impact on ovarian reserve and response remains unclear. This study investigates the associations between systemic inflammatory markers, ovarian reserve—assessed by anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) and antral follicle count (AFC)—and ovarian response, measured by the number of oocytes retrieved, in women undergoing assisted reproductive treatment (ART).
methodsA retrospective cohort study of 19,282 women evaluated systemic inflammatory markers, including systemic immune-inflammation index (SII), platelet-neutrophil product (PPN), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), derived from neutrophil, platelet, and lymphocyte counts. Blood samples were collected on menstrual cycle days 2–4 for complete blood count analysis. Linear regression assessed associations between inflammatory markers and ovarian reserve (AMH, AFC) or ovarian response (oocytes retrieved). Restricted cubic splines tested nonlinear relationships, and stratified analyses identified sensitive subpopulations.
resultsElevated first-trimester systemic inflammatory markers, including SII, PPN, PLR, and NLR, were significantly associated with reduced ovarian reserve and ovarian response. Adjusted models confirmed dose-response declines: highest vs. lowest quartiles showed significant reductions in AMH (e.g., SII β=-0.037, 95% CI -0.055, -0.018), AFC (e.g., NLR β=-0.116, 95% CI -0.150, -0.082), and oocytes retrieved (e.g., PPN β=-0.072, 95% CI -0.106, -0.039) (all P < 0.05). Nonlinear relationships were observed for PLR and NLR with AFC (inflection points at PLR = 123.53, NLR = 2.22; P nonlinear < 0.05). Stratified analyses indicated greater susceptibility in women on antagonist protocols (P interaction < 0.05), but not by age or BMI. Sensitivity analyses corroborated robustness.
conclusionElevated systemic inflammatory markers are associated with diminished ovarian reserve and response. These findings suggest that inflammatory markers may serve as potential predictors of ovarian function and treatment outcomes, emphasizing the need to address systemic inflammation in fertility care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.