ArticleRespiratory research2026
Combined effects of mesenchymal stromal cells and antibiotic therapy on Enterobacter ventilator-associated pneumonia in rabbits.
Article in Respiratory research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Host-pathogen interactions during ESKAPE-mediated urinary tract infections and ventilator-associated pneumonia: a review.Folia microbiologica · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) have shown promising effects in preclinical pneumonia models, their ability to improve outcomes in ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) remains poorly explored, despite VAP being a frequent and severe complication in critically ill patients. This study investigated whether MSCs could enhance outcomes in a rabbit VAP model.
methodsMale rabbits were ventilated and received lipopolysaccharide (LPS, 3 ng/kg) to mimic sepsis-induced immune dysfunction. After 24 h, animals were inoculated intratracheally with Enterobacter aerogenes to induce VAP. In experiment 1, rabbits (n = 10/group) were randomized to receive human umbilical cord-derived MSCs (3 × 10^6/kg, intravenous) or saline, 4 h after bacterial challenge. In experiment 2, all rabbits received cefepime, with or without MSCs. Outcomes included lung bacterial load (primary), systemic dissemination, 24 h survival, lung injury, and markers of immune and mitochondrial dysfunction.
resultsMSC infusion alone did not improve survival (8/10 vs. 9/10; p = .46), lung bacterial load (median [IQR] 6.67 [5.64-7.60] vs. 6.08 [5.72-6.82] log10 CFU/ml; p = .37), systemic dissemination, or lung inflammation. Similarly, lung pathology scores, alveolar neutrophils, and systemic cytokines were unaffected. In contrast, when combined with cefepime, MSCs showed a non-significant trend toward improved survival (10/10 vs. 7/10; p = .067), significantly reduced lung bacterial burden (5.23 [5.05-5.56] vs. 5.47 [5.18-7.01] log10 CFU/ml; p = .049), improved macroscopic lung scores (p = .008), and lowered IL-6 levels (p = .037). However, MSCs did not correct systemic immune dysfunction.
conclusionMSCs alone did not improve lung bacterial clearance or inflammation resolution in this rabbit VAP model. However, the combination of MSCs with cefepime enhanced lung bacterial clearance and reduced lung IL-6 concentrations, compared with cefepime alone. Further studies are required to elucidate the mechanisms underlying the combined effects of antibiotics and MSCs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.