ReviewBMC health services research2026
Current state and future directions of health services and service management research on transitions in older age: a field-focused narrative review.
Review in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA thorough understanding of later-life transitions is key to designing and providing healthcare services that can help older adults and their carers navigate such times in life. Yet, to date, little is known about which types of transitions have drawn the attention of healthcare services scholars and how these transitions have been explored, made sense of and narrated over time. To fill this gap, we conducted a field-based narrative review seeking to critically summarise prior health services and service management research on transitions in late life and reconstruct the main narratives elaborated in this area.
methodsStudy retrieval entailed systematically searching the Web of Science database within pertinent journal categories to locate articles with a central focus on transition(s) characterising older age. Via citation mining, additional landmark papers were identified. The analysis and synthesis unveil how relevant research features (i.e. conceptualisations of transition adopted, study objectives, theoretical underpinnings, vocabularies, actors/places and methodological approaches) combine to give shape to distinct narratives about later-life transitions.
resultsWe find that the 335 included articles deal with four distinct conceptualisations of transition: in health states, across care settings/levels of care, relating to stressful/critical life events or end-of-life. Moreover, we identify two different, and partially contrasting, narratives. While the ‘healthcare consumption’ narrative primarily addresses health state and care transitions with a strong focus on cost containment, the ‘ageing experience’ narrative deals with the lived reality of a wide array of moments of transition, involving older adults immersed in a rich relational environment.
conclusionsOur review documents that the two narratives emphasise diverse views of ageing and of what the care system should do to accompany older adults through transitions. While emerging paradigms call for greater sensitivity to subjective stances, the challenges associated with reconciling individual and organisational demands appear evident. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.