Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41501795›Full record

ArticleTrials2026

Comparison of a mean arterial pressure alarm to the hypotension prediction index in preventing intraoperative hypotension in elective moderate- to high-risk non-cardiac surgical patients: a study protocol for a blinded, parallel, randomized controlled trial with a non-inferiority framework.

Marijn P Mulder, Anna A Florax, Mirjam Harmannij-Markusse, Libera Fresiello, Dirk W Donker, Jan-Willem Potters

Abstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in Trials, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marijn P MulderCardiovascular and Respiratory Physiology, TechMed Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands. m.p.mulder-1@utwente.nl.
Anna A FloraxCardiovascular and Respiratory Physiology, TechMed Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Mirjam Harmannij-MarkusseTechnical Medicine, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Libera FresielloCardiovascular and Respiratory Physiology, TechMed Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Dirk W DonkerCardiovascular and Respiratory Physiology, TechMed Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
Jan-Willem PottersCardiovascular and Respiratory Physiology, TechMed Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntraoperative hypotension is common in surgical patients and associated with an increased risk for acute kidney injury, myocardial injury, and 30-day mortality. To predict hypotension and thereby promote proactive blood pressure management, a machine learning algorithm was developed: the Hypotension Prediction Index (HPI). In clinical trials, it proved to prevent hypotension. However, a recent observational study found that the performance of the HPI in predicting hypotension up to 15 min in advance was virtually identical to that of the concurrent mean arterial pressure (MAP). This indicates that the added value of the HPI above continuous MAP monitoring may be limited. It is hypothesized that the effect of preventing intraoperative hypotension triggered by a MAP threshold of 70-75 mmHg is comparable to clinical care triggered by an HPI alarm.

methodsThis is a monocentral, blinded, randomized controlled clinical trial, conducted in the Netherlands. Adult patients undergoing moderate- or high-risk elective non-cardiac surgery requiring continuous blood pressure monitoring aiming for a MAP of ≥65 mmHg are eligible for inclusion. A total of 142 participants is randomized into two groups: in the HPI group, the monitor alarms when the HPI value exceeds 85, whereas in the MAP group, it alarms when the MAP value drops below 72 mmHg. The monitor screen is partly covered to blind treating clinicians for the study group allocation. The primary outcome measure is the area under the threshold of hypotension (defined as MAP < 65 mmHg for at least 1 min) during surgery. Secondary objectives are the incidence and severity of intraoperative hypotension and hypertension, cumulative doses of administered medication and fluids, incidence of acute kidney injury and myocardial injury, length of hospital stay, and 30-day mortality after surgery. DISCUSSION: The decision to initiate treatment upon an alarm is left at the discretion of the attending clinicians; if deemed appropriate, they can also choose to ignore the alarms. Consequently, clinical interventions could vary between participants and groups. Contrarily, early treatment could lead to overtreatment.

trial registrationOverview of Medical research in the Netherlands (OMON), NL-OMON53215, registered on 20-09-2023, last updated on 30-01-2025, https://onderzoekmetmensen.nl/nl/trial/53215 .

Indexed as

Arterial PressureClinical AlarmsElective Surgical ProceduresHypotensionIntraoperative ComplicationsMonitoring, IntraoperativeEquivalence Trials as TopicHumansNetherlandsPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Value of TestsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRisk FactorsTime FactorsAlarmBlindedBlood pressureHypotension prediction indexIntraoperative hypotensionMean arterial pressurePostoperative complicationsRandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID41501795
PMCPMC12870446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.