Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41501792›Full record

ArticleBMC veterinary research2026

Diagnostic gap analysis in animal health through combining public databases.

Latifa Elhachimi, Natalia Ciria, Johannes Charlier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC veterinary research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Latifa ElhachimiKreavet, Hendrik Mertensstraat 17, Kruibeke, 9150, Belgium. latifa@kreavet.com.
Natalia CiriaDepartament de Sanitat i Anatomia Animals, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (UAB), Bellaterra, Barcelona, 08193, Spain.
Johannes CharlierKreavet, Hendrik Mertensstraat 17, Kruibeke, 9150, Belgium.

Funding

European Union SIRCAH2 (101082377)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The burden of infectious diseases in animals, particularly in livestock, significantly impacts global food security and economic development. Despite advancements in diagnostic technologies, substantial gaps remain that hinder effective disease control and surveillance. This study presents a new methodology for identifying gaps in animal health diagnosis by integrating data from DISCONTOOLS, the Diagnostics for Animals' List of Animal Health Diagnostics, and the World Animal Health Information System. Our analysis highlights significant diagnostic needs, particularly for high-priority infectious diseases in livestock. The findings aim to guide research and development efforts to improve disease surveillance and control.

Indexed as

Animal DiseasesCommunicable DiseasesDatabases, FactualAnimalsLivestockDiagnosticsDISCONTOOLSInfectious diseasesResearch prioritisationVeterinary

Identifiers

PMID41501792
PMCPMC12908355

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.