ArticleBMC health services research2026
Impact of government subsidy reforms on primary health care efficiency in rural eastern China: an interrupted time series analysis.
Article in BMC health services research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite rising government subsidies, inefficiencies persist in China’s primary health-care system. We evaluated an eastern rural pilot that shifted subsidies from passive grants to strategic purchasing via fixed salaries plus activity-based payments using resource-based relative value units (RVUs).
methodsInterrupted time series (January 2015 - December 2022) assess the instantaneous and long-term effects of the reform (implemented January 2017) on monthly RVUs per employee across all primary health institutions (PHIs) and three sub-categories (central town/street PHIs, other PHIs, remote countryside PHIs). COVID-19 onset (January 2020) was incorporated as a secondary intervention to control for its confounding effect.
resultsPost-reform, RVUs per employee were associated with a 61.17% level increase and a sustained upward slope (+3.13; 95% CI 1.65–4.61).The post-COVID slope was associated with a deceleration of −1.74 RVUs per month (95% CI:−3.23 to −0.24), consistent with pandemic disruption rather than definitive causation. Remote countryside PHIs showed no immediate level change (p = 0.18) but exhibited a significantly steeper post-reform slope (β₃ = +7.58; 95% CI: 3.42–11.75) and the steepest post-pandemic deceleration (slope change: −9.35; 95% CI:−12.14 to −6.55), indicating slope-based responsiveness. Cross-group comparisons suggest that smaller PHIs with higher subsidy dependence were more responsive to both the reform and the pandemic’s disruptive effects, although this association does not establish causation.
conclusionsStrategic purchasing was associated with moderate PHC efficiency gains in rural eastern China. Smaller, remote institutions demonstrated greater slope-based responsiveness to policy changes yet remained more vulnerable in terms of slope to external shocks such as COVID-19. Long-term efficiency gains require targeted support for underserved PHIs and continued refinement of activity-based payment mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.