ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2026
Clinical application of hysteroscopic decidual polypectomy in pregnant women.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aims to explore the clinical efficacy and safety of hysteroscopic decidua polypectomy during pregnancy.
methodsThis retrospective study analyzed 38 patients presenting with recurrent vaginal bleeding due to pregnancy-associated decidual polyps who underwent hysteroscopic polypectomy at the Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University from January 2023 to January 2025. Data on surgical techniques, timing of intervention, and subsequent pregnancy outcomes were evaluated.
resultsA total of 38 patients who underwent hysteroscopic decidual polypectomy were included in this study, with an age range of 23-39 years (mean 28.7 ± 2.4 years). Among them, 31 were primiparous and 7 were multiparous. The gestational age at surgery ranged from 8 to 19 weeks (mean 11.0 ± 3.2 weeks). All 38 patients presented with recurrent vaginal bleeding during pregnancy. The polyp diameter ranged from 1.4 to 5.5 cm (mean 3.82 ± 1.50 cm), with 22 cases (57.9%) having a diameter greater than 3 cm. All 38 patients successfully underwent hysteroscopic resection. The operative time ranged from 4 to 10 minutes (mean 5.43 ± 1.42 minutes), , with intraoperative blood loss of 0–5 ml (mean 2.53 ± 0.49 ml). No patient experienced postoperative rebleeding or any perioperative complications. Of the 38 patients, 37completed pregnancy; the full-term delivery rate was 94.6% (35/378), with gestational age at delivery of 37–41.4 weeks (mean 39.12 ± 1.02 weeks). Among these, 26 spontaneous vaginal deliveries, 8 cesarean sections, and 1 forceps delivery. The preterm birth rate was 5.3% (2/38), and the spontaneous abortion rate was 2.6% (1/38).
conclusionHysteroscopy allows for painless, rapid , and precise resection of decidual polyps with effective hemostasis. It represents a safe and effective surgical approach for treating decidual polyps during pregnancy, but should be performed by experienced hysteroscopists to ensure optimal outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.