SynthesisBMC cancer2026
KRAS mutation and its association with clinicopathological features of colorectal cancer patients in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Advancing KRAS Modulation: Expanding Chemical Space toward Broad-Spectrum RAS-Driven Oncology.ACS medicinal chemistry letters · 2026Article
- Association between KRAS gene mutation and clinicopathological factors in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMutations in the KRAS gene serve as significant oncogenic drivers in colorectal cancer (CRC), greatly affecting therapy response and prognosis. While the prevalence and clinical significance of KRAS mutations have been extensively documented in Western populations, information from African contexts remains limited and inconsistent. Therefore, this study aimed to determine the pooled frequency of KRAS gene mutations and their relationship with the clinicopathological features of CRC patients in Africa.
methodsA comprehensive systematic search was conducted across databases, including PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Hinari, African Journals Online (AJOL), and African Index Medicus (AIM), as well as search engines and websites to identify studies reporting KRAS mutations in CRC patients throughout Africa. A random-effect meta-analysis was applied to estimate the pooled frequencies. Subgroup analysis and meta-regression were performed to identify possible sources of heterogeneity. A leave-one-out sensitivity analysis was also conducted to assess the robustness of the findings. Associations with clinical features were summarized descriptively due to the limited availability of effect size estimates.
resultsA total of 40 studies involving 5045 CRC patients were included. The overall pooled frequency of KRAS mutations was 39% (95% CI: 34%–44%), with substantial heterogeneity across studies (I² = 96.9%, p < 0.001). The mutation at exon 2 was the most prevalent, representing a pooled estimate of 37% (95% CI: 31%–43%) among all CRC patients. Within Exon 2, Codon 12 was the most common, with Gly12Asp at 12% (95% CI: 9%-14%) and Gly12Val at 9% (95% CI: 7%-10%) substitutions. Subgroup analysis revealed a higher mutation prevalence in North Africa (41%, 95% CI: 36%–45%). Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of the results, and meta-regression showed no significant influence of publication year or sample size. Evidence of publication bias was not detected. Although quantitative pooling was limited, some studies suggested that KRAS mutations were associated with younger age, right-sided tumor location, lymph node involvement, and adverse pathological features, including lymphovascular invasion, perineural invasion, and distant metastasis.
conclusionKRAS mutations were prevalent among CRC patients in Africa, with predominant exon 2 and codon 12 alterations. The findings underscore the need to expand molecular testing across African oncology centers and signify the importance of KRAS profiling to guide targeted therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.