ArticleBMC medical research methodology2026
Individual-centric N-of-1 trials: a case study assessing the effect of alcohol abstinence on mood levels.
Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPopularized in the 1980s, N-of-1 trials have emerged as a useful study design to assess the effects of interventions in single individuals. This study design consists of observing outcomes over time for the same individual under periods of exposure to an intervention and a comparator. Despite the simple idea, N-of-1 trials can require strong assumptions in the analysis phase to identify and estimate causal effects. As an illustrative example, we present an N-of-1 trial aiming at assessing the effect of alcohol abstinence on mood.
methodsThe N-of-1 trial participant decided to join a month-long nationwide alcohol abstinence campaign and was interested in the effects of alcohol abstinence on his mood. Every eight hours, the participant collected data about his own mood levels, number of alcohol units consumed, and social interactions, before, during, and after the alcohol abstinence period. Mood levels were measured using a 5-point Likert scale ranging from -2 to 2. To analyze the N-of-1 trial data, we relied on an explicit causal framework and made precise assumptions about the data generating process. We used a g-computation algorithm to estimate, for each time point, the individual-specific difference between the expected mood outcomes under the "always abstain from alcohol" intervention and "always drinking as usual" comparator.
resultsOverall, 264 time points were recorded, 171 under no intervention, and 93 during the intervention (alcohol abstinence) period. After adjusting for the other time-varying causes of mood, no statistically significant effect of alcohol units on mood level was found for measurements at the same time point; however, the number of alcohol units reported had a statistically significant negative effect on mood levels at the subsequent time point. The mean of the individual-specific average treatment effects across the entire study period was 0.05 (95%CI: -0.06, 0.15).
conclusionsN-of-1 trials can be truly individual-centric studies, tailored to the needs and preferences of the participants. Analyzing data from N-of-1 trials can be complex, and the use of a causal framework can help inform the analyses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.