ArticleBMC primary care2026
Does living alone reshape healthcare use? Longitudinal evidence from older adults in China.
Article in BMC primary care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Blood pressure status, JSH 2019-based control rate, and associated factors among community-dwelling adults: The NOSE study.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundChina's rapid population aging and shrinking family structures challenge healthcare access for older adults, especially those living alone. While the link between solitary living and poor health is well-documented, its underlying mechanisms remain unclear. This study examines how living alone shapes healthcare-seeking preferences and behaviors to elucidate its pathways to health in later life.
methodsUsing longitudinal data from the China Family Panel Studies (2010-2020), restricted to a sample of adults aged 60 and above, we employed a linear probability model with individual and time fixed effects to examine the impact of living alone on two key outcomes: the probability of consulting a doctor when ill (n = 3,911) and the preference for primary healthcare centers (PHCs) (n = 11,956). The model controlled for a set of covariates including demographic characteristics, family attributes, and health status measures. Heterogeneity analyses were conducted by gender, hukou status, and household income.
resultsLiving alone was associated with a significant reduction in the probability of consulting a doctor (20.2% points), with the effect more pronounced among older women, suggesting that emotional or psychological barriers may exacerbate their vulnerability. In contrast, older adults living alone demonstrated a stronger preference for PHCs (10.9% points), a tendency that was particularly evident among lower-income and urban residents, likely due to the greater accessibility, lower cost, and shorter waiting times of PHCs. IMPLICATIONS: Strengthening community-based interventions and enhancing the quality and coverage of primary care-particularly in rural areas-are essential to reducing treatment delays and promoting early care-seeking. Policy efforts should prioritise the unique vulnerabilities of older women, low-income individuals, and rural residents by addressing emotional barriers, improving health literacy, and enhancing the accessibility of services. Rebuilding trust in primary care requires sustained investment in provider professionalism, facility infrastructure, and efficient referral systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.