ArticleBMC genomics2026
Retroelement expansions underlie genome evolution in stingless bees.
Article in BMC genomics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Stingless bees serve as crucial pollinators and are increasingly recognized as models for investigating behavioral and genomic evolution in insects. In the genus Melipona, a major difference in heterochromatin organization defines two groups: Group I species (e.g., M. quadrifasciata) with < 50% of pericentromeric heterochromatin and Group II species (e.g., M. scutellaris) containing > 50% heterochromatin across their chromosomes. These differences are believed to correlate with genome size and transposable element (TE) content, offering a unique opportunity to explore how heterochromatin variation, TE dynamics, and chromosomal evolution interact in a phylogenetic context. We present pseudo-chromosome-level genome assemblies for M. quadrifasciata and M. scutellaris obtained through long-read sequencing and 3D chromosome conformation scaffolding. Comparative analyses reveal conserved synteny but marked divergence in structural variants and TE types. M. scutellaris exhibits an expansion of retrotransposons, particularly Gypsy/DIRS1 elements, concentrated in TE hotspots linked to chromosomal rearrangements and structural variants. This coincides with distinct methylation entropy patterns across the genome and an expansion of histone deacetylase orthologs. The increased proportion of retrotransposons in M. scutellaris is counterbalanced by more DNA transposons in M. quadrifasciata, resulting in genomes of similar overall sizes but with distinct heterochromatin distributions. Advancing our understanding of genome evolution in eusocial insects, we provide high-resolution genomic resources for two Melipona species that differ in heterochromatin content. Our results highlight the complex role of TEs in shaping genomes and underscore their influence on chromosomal and epigenetic innovation, providing compelling evidence that TE dynamics underlie the pronounced heterochromatic differences observed in Melipona.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.