Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41501530›Full record

ArticleNature plants2026

New alleles of Arabidopsis BIK1 reinforce its predominant role in pattern-triggered immunity and caution interpretations of other reported functions.

Beibei Song, Sera Choi, Liang Kong, Sung-Il Kim, Judith Fliegmann, Xiuming Li, Yong Gao, Thomas A DeFalco, Meijuan Hu, Meng Li and 8 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature plants, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Beibei Song *Institute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Sera Choi *Institute of Plant and Microbial Biology, Zurich-Basel Plant Science Center, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Liang KongDepartment of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Sung-Il KimDepartment of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1061-0609
Judith FliegmannCenter of Plant Molecular Biology (ZMBP), University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1021-8006
Xiuming LiInstitute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Yong GaoYazhouwan National Laboratory, Sanya, China.
Thomas A DeFalcoInstitute of Plant and Microbial Biology, Zurich-Basel Plant Science Center, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-2897-1485
Meijuan HuInstitute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Meng LiInstitute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Yan ZhaoInstitute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Hongze WangYazhouwan National Laboratory, Sanya, China.ORCID 0000-0002-6535-9474
Shengwei MaYazhouwan National Laboratory, Sanya, China.ORCID 0000-0001-6196-811X
Libo ShanDepartment of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4798-9907
Thorsten NürnbergerCenter of Plant Molecular Biology (ZMBP), University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Ping HeDepartment of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. pinghemi@umich.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-5926-8349
Cyril ZipfelInstitute of Plant and Microbial Biology, Zurich-Basel Plant Science Center, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. cyril.zipfel@botinst.uzh.ch.ORCID 0000-0003-4935-8583
Jian-Min ZhouInstitute of Genetics and Developmental Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China. jmzhou@genetics.ac.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-9943-2975

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 31761143017
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The receptor-like cytoplasmic kinase BIK1 and its close homologue PBL1 have been widely recognized as central components of plant immunity. However, most genetic studies of BIK1 and PBL1 functions were carried out with single transfer DNA (T-DNA) insertional mutant alleles. Some phenotypes observed in these mutants, for example autoimmunity, have been difficult to reconcile with the proposed role of BIK1 and PBL1 in pattern-triggered immunity. In this study, we generated several new alleles of bik1 and pbl1 by CRISPR-Cas9-based gene editing and systematically analysed these mutants alongside existing T-DNA insertional lines. These analyses reinforced the central role of BIK1 and PBL1 in pattern-triggered immunity mediated by both receptor kinases and receptor-like proteins. At the same time, however, we revealed several pleiotropic phenotypes associated with T-DNA insertions that are not necessarily linked to loss of BIK1 or PBL1 function. Further analyses of newly generated bik1 pbl1 double mutants uncovered an even greater contribution of these kinases to immune signalling and disease resistance than previously appreciated. These findings clarify longstanding ambiguities surrounding BIK1 and PBL1 functions.

Indexed as

ArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsPlant ImmunityProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesAllelesDNA, BacterialMutationPlant DiseasesProtein KinasesArabidopsis ProteinsBIK1 protein, ArabidopsisDNA, BacterialProtein KinasesProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesT-DNA

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.