ArticleAcademic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry2026
Evaluation of Gender Bias in Psychiatry Residency Letters of Recommendation.
Article in Academic psychiatry : the journal of the American Association of Directors of Psychiatric Residency Training and the Association for Academic Psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveApplying to psychiatry residency has become increasingly competitive over the last decade. As such, increased weight is placed on each application element, including letters of recommendation (LOR). LOR has been shown to be sources of gender bias for applicants in other specialties. No studies currently exist that analyze gender bias in LOR for psychiatry applicants. This study aimed to evaluate the presence of gender bias in LOR for students applying to psychiatry.
methodsLOR for residency applicants to a small to mid-sized university-based psychiatry program from the 2023-2024 residency match cycle was reviewed using linguistic text analysis. The software identified words in 96 thematic categories and word count. Text mining techniques were applied to determine word frequency for male and female letters. Logistic regression analyses were performed.
resultsA total of 975 traditional LOR for male applicants and 764 LOR for female applicants was analyzed. Only the "female reference" and "male reference" categories demonstrated statistical significance. The word frequency analysis indicated no difference in the top ten words written in LOR for male and female applicants. There was no statistical difference in word count for male or female letters, and logistic regression with least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) method failed to identify any categories that would be more likely to predict a female letter vs. a male letter.
conclusionA linguistic text analysis of LOR for those applying to a single psychiatry residency program in the U.S. found no meaningful evidence of gender bias.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41501516What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.