Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41501514›Full record

ArticleArchives of toxicology2026

The way forward for assessing the human health safety of cosmetics in the EU: Proceedings of Workshop 2.

SCCS - Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety, Vera Rogiers, Emilio Benfenati, Ulrike Bernauer, Laurent Bodin, Patience Browne, Nicolas Cabaton, Qasim Chaudhry, Pieter Jan Coenraads, Emanuela Corsini and 19 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of toxicology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors.

SCCS - Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety
Vera RogiersDepartment of In Vitro Toxicology and Dermato-Cosmetology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.
Emilio BenfenatiIstituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
Ulrike BernauerGerman Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), Berlin, Germany.
Laurent BodinAlternative Energies and Atomic Energy Commission (CEA), Saclay, France.
Patience BrowneOrganisation for Economic Co-operation and Development - OECD, Paris, France.
Nicolas CabatonFrench National Research Institute for Agriculture, Food and the Environment (INRAE TOXALIM), Toulouse, France.
Qasim ChaudhryUniversity of Chester, Chester, UK.
Pieter Jan CoenraadsUniversity of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Emanuela CorsiniUniversità degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Matthew DentUnilever Safety, Environmental and Regulatory Science, Colworth Science Park, Sharnbrook, Bedfordshire, MK44, UK.
Corie EllisonThe Procter & Gamble Company, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
Janine EzendamNational Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Eric GaffetInstitute Jean Lamour (UMR 7198 CNRS Université de Lorraine), Nancy, France.
Corrado Lodovico GalliFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Effrosyni KatsanouEuropean Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC), Ispra, Italy.
Aglaia KoutsodimouGeneral Chemical State Laboratory, Athens, Greece.
Henriqueta LouroNational Institute of Health Dr. Ricardo Jorge (INSA), Lisbon, Portugal.
Abdulkarim NajjarDepartment Global Toxicology, Beiersdorf AG, Beiersdorfstraße 1-9, 22529, Hamburg, Germany.
Alicia PainiEuropean Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Parma, Italy.
Eirini PanteriFaculty of Pharmacy, Laboratory of Pharmaceutical Analysis, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Panepistimiopolis - Zografou, 157 71, Athens, Greece.
Christophe RousselleFrench Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety (Anses), European and International Affairs, Maison-Alfort, France.
Nikaeta SadekarResearch Institute for Fragrance Materials - RIFM, Mahwah, NJ, USA.
Andreas SchepkyInternational Collaboration on Cosmetics Safety - ICCS, Mt. Royal, USA.
Maciej StępnikQsar Lab Ltd., Gdańsk, Poland; Department of Toxicology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Medical University of Łódź, Łódź, Poland.
Wolfgang UterUniversity of Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen and Nuremberg, Germany.
Tamara VanhaeckeFederal Office of Public Health (FOPH), Bern, Switzerland.
Natalie von GoetzFederal Office of Public Health (FOPH), Bern, Switzerland.
Susan WijnhovenRIVM, Centre for Safety of Substances and Products (VSP), Centre for Substances and Integrated Risk Assessment (SIR), Bilthoven, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Under the European Cosmetic Regulation, safety assessments of cosmetics and their ingredients must be conducted without the use of animals. This regulatory requirement poses a number of challenges, as validated alternative methods are only available for some of the toxicological endpoints that are typically considered in standard human health risk assessments. Despite significant progress since the ban in 2013, particularly in the development of New Approach Methodologies (NAMs) for local and acute toxicity, and for mutagenicity/genotoxicity, there remains an urgent need for non-animal test methods to assess systemic toxicity, which often becomes evident after repeated or long-term exposure. Currently, no validated animal-free alternatives are available for assessing sub-acute, sub-chronic and chronic toxicity, carcinogenicity, developmental/reproductive toxicity, or for a major part of toxicokinetics. In response to these challenges, the Methodology Working Group of the Scientific Committee on Consumer Safety organised a dedicated workshop in December 2024 to discuss advances in the application of Next Generation Risk Assessment (NGRA) as a strategic animal-free approach for the safety assessment of cosmetic ingredients. The workshop focused on a number of important key issues for the practical application of NAMs and NGRA, their regulatory acceptance and identification of possible (partial) solutions to overcome existing limitations.

Indexed as

Consumer Product SafetyCosmeticsToxicity TestsAnimalsAnimal Testing AlternativesEuropean UnionHumansRisk AssessmentCosmeticsAlternative methodAnimal-free methodCosmeticsNAMNew approach methodologyNext generation risk assessmentNGRAReplacement methodSafety assessmentSafety evaluationSCCSScientific Committee on Consumer Safety

Identifiers

PMID41501514
PMCPMC13043536

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.