ArticleLeukemia2026
NUP98 rearrangements in adult AML patients: evaluation of clinical implications and identification of novel fusion partners.
Article in Leukemia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Myeloid blast phase of chronic myeloid leukemia with co-occurring t(11;12)(p15;q13)/Haematologica · 2026Article
- DDX10 RNA Helicase: Structure, Function, and Oncogenic Roles Across Solid and Hematologic Tumors.Genes · 2026Review
- MEOX2: a homeobox transcription factor with multifaceted biological functions and broad disease associations.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
32 authors.
Funding
Abstract
NUP98 rearrangements represent a distinct, high-risk subtype of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), particularly in pediatric patients. However, their prevalence, genetic features, and clinical implications in adult AML remain poorly characterized. Using targeted-capture sequencing, we identified 41 cases with NUP98 rearrangements among 1569 AML cases, representing the majority of 44 NUP98-rearranged cases detected across 4753 myeloid neoplasms. Fifteen distinct fusion partners were detected, with NUP98::NSD1 and NUP98::HOXA9 being the most frequent. Notably, two novel fusions-NUP98::MEOX2 and NUP98::HOXA6-were identified. Co-mutations were relatively infrequent; FLT3-ITD and WT1 mutations were the most common, while NPM1 mutations were exclusive. FLT3-ITD was significantly enriched in NUP98::NSD1 cases, whereas TET2 mutations were more frequent in NUP98::HOXA9 cases. Clonal hierarchy analysis suggested that NUP98 rearrangements occur early in leukemogenesis. NUP98-rearranged AML exhibited higher relapse rates and shorter event-free survival. Specifically, NUP98::NSD1 was associated with a poor induction response, whereas NUP98::HOXA9 and NUP98 fusions with other partners showed higher remission rates but frequent relapse. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation was associated with better survival, underscoring its significance. These findings reveal the genetic and clinical heterogeneity of NUP98-rearranged AML in adults and support its classification as a distinct entity, highlighting the need for fusion partner-specific therapeutic strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41501506What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.