ReviewNature microbiology2026
Approaches for accelerating microbial gene function discovery using artificial intelligence.
Review in Nature microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence for Microbial Isolation and Cultivation: Progress and Challenges.Microorganisms · 2026Review
- Navigating the promise and pitfalls of artificial intelligence.Nature microbiology · 2026Article
- Discovery and cultivation of prokaryotic taxa in the age of metagenomics and artificial intelligence.The ISME journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Although genome sequencing technologies have advanced rapidly, microbial genomes still contain numerous genes with unknown functions, posing ongoing challenges for comprehensive genome annotation. Traditional annotation methods are constrained by a lack of scalable experimental techniques and the limitations of conventional homology-based computational approaches. Recent computational innovations, particularly deep learning, have substantially improved gene function prediction, facilitating more efficient annotation of transcription factors, enzymes and other protein classes. Integrating computational and experimental approaches has enabled the development of workflows that systematize gene function discovery, paving the way for faster, more accurate and comprehensive genome annotation. Continued refinement of these integrated methods holds great promise for deepening our understanding of microorganisms. Here we review recent advances in artificial intelligence for gene function discovery and discuss future directions for achieving interpretable and high-throughput artificial intelligence-guided annotation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41501479What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.