Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41501479›Full record

ReviewNature microbiology2026

Approaches for accelerating microbial gene function discovery using artificial intelligence.

Bernhard O Palsson, Sang Yup Lee, Gi Bae Kim

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Bernhard O PalssonDepartment of Bioengineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla,CA, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2357-6785
Sang Yup LeeMetabolic and Biomolecular Engineering National Research Laboratory, Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering (BK21 Four), Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, Republic of Korea. leesy@kaist.ac.kr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0599-3091
Gi Bae KimMetabolic and Biomolecular Engineering National Research Laboratory, Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering (BK21 Four), Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7563-5551

Funding

National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) 2022M3J5A1056117National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) RS-2024-00399424
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although genome sequencing technologies have advanced rapidly, microbial genomes still contain numerous genes with unknown functions, posing ongoing challenges for comprehensive genome annotation. Traditional annotation methods are constrained by a lack of scalable experimental techniques and the limitations of conventional homology-based computational approaches. Recent computational innovations, particularly deep learning, have substantially improved gene function prediction, facilitating more efficient annotation of transcription factors, enzymes and other protein classes. Integrating computational and experimental approaches has enabled the development of workflows that systematize gene function discovery, paving the way for faster, more accurate and comprehensive genome annotation. Continued refinement of these integrated methods holds great promise for deepening our understanding of microorganisms. Here we review recent advances in artificial intelligence for gene function discovery and discuss future directions for achieving interpretable and high-throughput artificial intelligence-guided annotation.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceBacteriaComputational BiologyGenome, MicrobialGenome, BacterialGenomicsMolecular Sequence Annotation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.