ArticleCommunity mental health journal2026
A Survey Study of the Workplace Experiences of Young Adult Peer Support Workers in the United States.
Article in Community mental health journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study examined the workplace experiences of young adult peer support workers (YPSWs), including how these experiences differ by certification status and what barriers and recommendations YPSWs identify for improving their work environments. A cross-sectional survey was conducted via REDCap with 49 YPSWs aged 18-30 currently employed in a paid peer support role in the United States. Participants completed quantitative items assessing satisfaction with various workplace aspects, supervision, intergenerational inclusiveness, and stigma, and open-ended questions about workplace barriers and recommendations. Analyses included descriptive statistics, one-way ANOVA tests comparing certified and non-certified YPSWs, and thematic analysis of qualitative responses. Respondents reported relatively high satisfaction with fringe benefits, training, and supervision, but lower satisfaction with opportunities and rewards. Most reported a positive intergenerational climate and little stigma from coworkers. Youth certified peer specialists reported significantly lower satisfaction with opportunities and rewards and benefits than non-certified peers, and significantly lower satisfaction with supervision than general certified peer specialists. Qualitative data revealed key workload, policy, and individual barriers as well as age-related issues (e.g., lack of respect, imposter syndrome). Respondents recommended improvements for leadership, policy, job incentives, workforce capacity and support, peer integration, and collaboration and inclusion. Findings highlight both strengths and challenges in YPSW work environments, with notable disparities by certification status. Given their unique developmental stage and experiences of marginalization, strengthening this workforce will require attention to compensation, role clarity, and inclusion through a positive youth development lens.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.