Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41501397›Full record

ArticleCommunications medicine2026

Impact of drug repurposing between 1985 and 2024 on pharmaceutical innovation.

Sanae Akodad, Xixian Niu, Berta Secades, Hilde Stevens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Communications medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Old Drugs, New Opportunities: Advancing Cancer Care Through Repurposing.United European gastroenterology journal · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sanae AkodadInstitute for Interdisciplinary Innovation in Healthcare (I3h), Faculté de Médecine, Solvay Brussels School of Economics and Management, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium. sanae.akodad@ulb.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-6221-4794
Xixian NiuInstitute for Interdisciplinary Innovation in Healthcare (I3h), Faculté de Médecine, Solvay Brussels School of Economics and Management, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.
Berta SecadesInstitute for Interdisciplinary Innovation in Healthcare (I3h), Faculté de Médecine, Solvay Brussels School of Economics and Management, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.
Hilde StevensInstitute for Interdisciplinary Innovation in Healthcare (I3h), Faculté de Médecine, Solvay Brussels School of Economics and Management, Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDrug repurposing describes the approval of an already authorized medicine for a new therapeutic indication. Rising development costs, long clinical timelines and attrition in first-in-class discovery have renewed interest in this strategy as a way to extend pharmacological value using pre-validated mechanisms. This study evaluates how repurposing has contributed to pharmaceutical innovation over four decades, examining approval patterns, therapeutic redirection and industry behavior.

methodsA longitudinal dataset of all new molecular entities and biologic products approved by the United States regulator between 1985 and 2024 was constructed. Repurposing was defined strictly as a new therapeutic indication distinct from the original approval. All cases were verified using regulatory documentation. Descriptive analyses quantified approval volumes, therapeutic transitions, applicant trajectories and development intervals. We compared the time to repurposing when development remained within the original company versus when rights transferred externally.

resultsHere we show that 451 drugs received subsequent approval for a new therapeutic use, representing a substantial fraction of authorized medicines. Oncology and neurological disorders act as major nodes of redirection, serving both as frequent endpoints and as mechanistic sources for cross-domain translation. The mean interval between first approval and repurposing is 7.2 years, shorter than typical development timelines for newly originated drugs. Repurposing occurs more rapidly when development rights remain with the original owner, and large firms account for most approvals.

conclusionsRepurposing has become a durable component of pharmaceutical innovation, enabling faster clinical deployment of validated mechanisms across disease domains. These findings highlight its potential to expand treatment options while reducing R&D uncertainty.

Identifiers

PMID41501397
PMCPMC12876941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.