ArticleNPJ precision oncology2026
Optical genome mapping as a high-resolution tool for uncovering cytogenetic complex and cryptic alterations in a cohort of patients with MDS and AML.
Article in NPJ precision oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cytogenetic and molecular studies are the standard of care in the diagnosis of myelodysplastic neoplasms (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML), which are characterized by a highly heterogeneous genetic landscape. This complexity challenges accurate characterization, risk stratification, and treatment decision-making. Optical Genome Mapping (OGM) is emerging as a high-resolution technique capable of detecting cryptic structural variants (SVs) and copy number changes (CNVs). In this study, we analyzed 150 MDS and AML patients using standard diagnostic methods and complemented by OGM to assess its utility in resolving complex karyotypes and uncovering hidden genomic aberrations. The results revealed novel alterations and refined previous cytogenetic results (e.g., breakpoints, translocation partners) in 80% of cases, involving clinically relevant genes such as MECOM, KMT2A, and NUP98. Importantly, in complex karyotypes, undefined marker chromosomes and chromoanagenesis events were resolved by OGM, uncovering genomic aberrations with potential clinical relevance. Overall, our findings demonstrate that OGM enables a more comprehensive genomic characterization of patients, uncovering cryptic genomic alterations and resolving complex karyotypes in AML and MDS. The identified abnormalities have shown significant and potential clinical implications. Additionally, the discovery of novel alterations could offer insights into previously unknown pathogenic mechanisms, enhancing our understanding of AML and MDS pathogenesis.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.