ArticleScientific reports2026
Evaluation of an ultrasound-guided alveolar recruitment technique with incremental PEEP in dogs: a clinical study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pulmonary atelectasis is common following general anesthesia in dogs, often due to reduced functional residual capacity, oxygen absorption, and surfactant dysfunction. This study evaluated an ultrasound-guided alveolar recruitment maneuver (ARM) using incremental positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) in anesthetized client-owned dogs with ultrasound-confirmed atelectasis. Dogs were assigned to two groups: mechanically ventilated (MV) or spontaneously breathing (SB). Following anesthesia, lung ultrasound atelectasis scores (LUAS) were recorded post-procedure and during recruitment, which began at PEEP 5 cm H₂O, incrementally increasing by 3 cm H₂O every two minutes until atelectasis resolved. Hemodynamic and ventilatory parameters were recorded.Each group included 15 dogs. SB dogs were younger and had shorter anesthesia duration than MV dogs. Heart rate increased significantly at PEEP11 (SB) and PEEP14 (MV). Et’CO₂ rose in the SB group during early recruitment. Peak inspiratory pressure and compliance were significantly lower post-recruitment (p < 0.0001). Regional LUAS was significantly higher post-procedure than during recruitment, indicating effective atelectasis resolution. Total LUAS was higher in MV dogs than SB dogs. This study demonstrates that ultrasound-guided LUAS is a reliable, non-invasive tool for detecting and monitoring pulmonary atelectasis in dogs, and effectively guides individualized ARM protocols to improve perioperative respiratory care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.