ReviewExperimental & molecular medicine2026
The functional imperative in high-grade glioma.
Review in Experimental & molecular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Molecular Oncodiagnostics in Precision Oncology: Integrating Tumor Transcriptomics, Patient Pharmacogenetics, and Ex Vivo Chemoresistance Testing to Improve Individual Chemotherapy Response.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Precision oncology has emerged as a promising strategy for treating high-grade gliomas, yet its clinical impact has been disappointing, with over 300 clinical trials on targeted therapies failing to yield substantial improvements in patient outcomes. Current approaches primarily focus on static, marker-driven tumor features, which capture only a small portion of the complex biology that governs therapeutic responses. Functional precision oncology (FPO) offers a complementary approach, enhancing treatment selection in a personalized manner by dynamically testing patient-derived tumor cells against a range of available therapeutic agents. Here this review examines both historical and contemporary treatment strategies for high-grade gliomas and explores underlying reasons for the limited success of multiple precision oncology initiatives. We demonstrate how the incorporation of FPO in the armamentarium of glioma therapies may address these challenges and outline its proposed role as well as the practical considerations in utilizing FPO for clinical decision-making in patients with glioma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.