Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41501373›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Application and optimization of adaptive genetic algorithm in fencing training load prediction: a data visualization-based analytical approach.

Ya-Nan Jia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ya-Nan JiaNanjing Sport Institute Nanjing, 210014, Jiangsu, China. 13951762758@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study proposes an Adaptive Genetic Algorithm (AGA) model for predicting training load in fencing. Training load is defined using external mechanical load collected from sensors and is categorized into six components: strength, aerobic, capacity, endurance, speed, agility, and flexibility. The study employs the publicly available Daily and Sports Activities dataset, which includes data from eight healthy adults (four females and four males, aged 20-30) performing 19 types of activities. Time-series segments are mapped to fencing-related load patterns for model training and evaluation. The proposed AGA dynamically adjusts the fitness function, crossover rate, and mutation rate. Its performance is compared with several models, including Deep Neural Network with Gated Recurrent Unit (DNN-GRU), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Long Short-Term Memory with Attention Mechanism (LSTM-Attn), Event Adversarial Neural Network (EANN), and Temporal Attention Graph Convolutional Network (TA-GCN). The results show that the AGA consistently outperformed all comparison methods in terms of prediction error and goodness-of-fit. For example, in endurance load prediction, the test set achieves an R

Indexed as

SportsAdaptive AlgorithmsAdultAlgorithmsBoosting Machine Learning AlgorithmsData AnalyticsFemaleGenetic AlgorithmsHumansLong Short Term MemoryMaleNeural Networks, ComputerPrediction AlgorithmsYoung AdultAdaptive genetic algorithmData visualizationFencing training loadPredictive model optimizationTime series analysis

Identifiers

PMID41501373
PMCPMC12868701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.