ArticleScientific reports2026
Application and optimization of adaptive genetic algorithm in fencing training load prediction: a data visualization-based analytical approach.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study proposes an Adaptive Genetic Algorithm (AGA) model for predicting training load in fencing. Training load is defined using external mechanical load collected from sensors and is categorized into six components: strength, aerobic, capacity, endurance, speed, agility, and flexibility. The study employs the publicly available Daily and Sports Activities dataset, which includes data from eight healthy adults (four females and four males, aged 20-30) performing 19 types of activities. Time-series segments are mapped to fencing-related load patterns for model training and evaluation. The proposed AGA dynamically adjusts the fitness function, crossover rate, and mutation rate. Its performance is compared with several models, including Deep Neural Network with Gated Recurrent Unit (DNN-GRU), Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost), Long Short-Term Memory with Attention Mechanism (LSTM-Attn), Event Adversarial Neural Network (EANN), and Temporal Attention Graph Convolutional Network (TA-GCN). The results show that the AGA consistently outperformed all comparison methods in terms of prediction error and goodness-of-fit. For example, in endurance load prediction, the test set achieves an R
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.