ArticleHypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension2026
Evaluation of brain conductivity changes after three-month antihypertensive medication in patients with essential hypertension.
Article in Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The study investigates brain conductivity changes following a three-month antihypertensive treatment in 22 patients with essential hypertension. Utilizing a prospective, cross-sectional design, the research employed MREPT for brain conductivity mapping. Image analyses involved voxel-based and ROI-based techniques with statistical tests examining correlations between conductivity changes and age or blood pressure changes. Key findings included a significant increase in brain conductivity post-treatment, particularly in the anterior cingulate and right insula. Older patients exhibited smaller conductivity increases, notably in the corpus callosum. No significant correlation was found between changes in diastolic or systolic blood pressure and conductivity. Proposed mechanisms for these changes include improved cerebrospinal fluid dynamics, enhanced ion mobility, and normalized ion concentrations, suggesting brain conductivity as a potential biomarker for treatment efficacy. The study implies that brain conductivity could serve as a novel imaging biomarker for monitoring antihypertensive treatment efficacy in the brain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41501365What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.