ArticleScientific reports2026
Two-stage deep learning approach for screening for anterior disk displacement of the temporomandibular joint using orthopantomograms.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to develop a deep learning-based approach for the initial screening of anterior disk displacement (DD) of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) using orthopantomograms (OPG). A two-stage deep learning model was proposed: first, regions of interest were detected on orthopantomogram images using YOLOv5s; second, a classification model based on ResNet-18 and DANet was trained on magnetic resonance imaging–verified labels to identify TMJ DD. Diagnostic performance was evaluated through multi-class and binary classification analyses. In three-class classification (normal disk position, DD with reduction, and DD without reduction), the model achieved an overall accuracy of 69.22%. It performed well in identifying normal disk position (F1 score: 75.53%) and DD without reduction (F1 score: 77.49%) but showed lower performance in detecting DD with reduction (F1 score: 47.33%). In the binary classification, where DD with reduction and DD without reduction were combined into a single class, the model demonstrated improved accuracy (80.78%), sensitivity (81.93%), and specificity (78.89%). Beyond classification, the model also exhibited potential in estimating DD severity (R2 = 0.4768). Given its strong ability to differentiate between normal disk position and DD in a binary classification setting, this tool has the potential to serve as an initial screening tool for TMJ DD in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.