ArticleScientific reports2026
Evaluating civil aircraft crew go-around performance oriented towards airworthiness verification.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Human limits in next-generation fighter aviation: psychophysiological stressors, readiness, health, performance, and countermeasures.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Executing go-around maneuvers following the type-specific procedure is a critical safety measure for flight crews to avoid hazardous states during aircraft approach and landing. Consequently, evaluating the airworthiness of go-around procedures based on crew performance has become an integral part of human factors airworthiness verification for transport category aircraft. To accurately assess the airworthiness of go-around procedures, this study proposed a multi-source data-integrated assessment method for flight crew performance, specifically for airworthiness compliance verification. Firstly, human factors airworthiness verification scenarios were established by integrating the airworthiness requirements for transport category aircraft flight procedures with the type-specific go-around procedure. Based on this scenario, the comprehensive evaluation index system for crew performance centered on workload and work quality was established along with its measurement methods. Subsequently, simulator-based go-around flight experiments were designed and conducted for a transport category aircraft (MA600). Data on crew workload, situation awareness levels, stress levels, and objective time-series eye-tracking data were collected, and their characteristics were analyzed. The CRITIC and TOPSIS models were employed to achieve a dual-dimension comprehensive evaluation for go-around performance based on crew workload and work quality, which were measured by the data. The proposed dual-dimension crew performance assessment method based on workload and work quality effectively reflects the human-machine-environment system interactions inherent in the go-around procedure. This provides a significant compliance means for the flight procedures airworthiness verification of civil aircraft.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.