ArticleScientific reports2026
Attention-enhanced MobileNetV2 models for robust forest fire detection and classification.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Early detection of forest fires is essential to limit ecological damage and economic loss. This study evaluates two lightweight convolutional models for binary fire recognition using a balanced dataset of 5121 annotated images spanning diverse environments and illumination conditions. The first model, Att-MobileNetV2, augments MobileNetV2 with a Convolutional Block Attention Module to prioritize informative spatial and channel responses. The second model, MobileNetV2-TL, adopts transfer learning by retaining pre-trained MobileNetV2 weights and training compact task-specific heads. On the held-out test set, Att-MobileNetV2 attains 99.61% accuracy with an F1-score of 99.70%, precision of 99.32%, and recall of 99.19%. MobileNetV2-TL achieves 98.42% accuracy, 98.43% F1-score, 98.42% precision, and 99.47% recall. Ablation results indicate that attention improves discriminability over the MobileNetV2 backbone, and attention heatmaps provide qualitative evidence of focus on flame regions. Comparisons with classical machine-learning pipelines (RFC, SVM) and CNN baselines (e.g., VGG16) under a unified preprocessing and training regimen show consistent improvements. Model size and computational load remain sufficiently low for real-time inference on resource-limited platforms, including UAVs and fixed cameras. The results indicate a favorable balance between accuracy and efficiency and point to practical deployment in continuous fire-monitoring settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.