ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026
Uncertainty Quantification in Hemodynamic Metrics from 4D Flow MRI with Super-resolution in a Carotid Bifurcation Model.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Super-resolution (SR) with supervised learning has emerged as a viable tool to enhance 4D flow magnetic resonance imaging (4DMR) data post hoc, but its impact on carotid hemodynamic measurements remains unclear. In this study, we quantified uncertainties in a phantom carotid artery model by comparing native 4DMR with and without SR against computational fluid dynamics (CFD) results. A phantom carotid artery model with steady flow was scanned at 3 Tesla. Magnitude images were segmented, and phase images were converted to velocities (3T). A pretrained 4DFlowNet was implemented to produce SR data (3T SR). A CFD simulation was performed on the same set up, serving as a reference. Uncertainties of geometrical processing were assessed by surface and Hausdorff distances. Hemodynamic metrics included intraluminal velocity and vorticity statistics, flow rate, and wall shear stress (WSS). A paired two-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to test the comparisons. Segmentations yielded a mean ± SD surface distance of 0.31 ± 0.06 mm (38 ± 7.5% of voxel size) and a Hausdorff distance of 1.2 mm. SR processing improved flow patterns and statistics of intraluminal hemodynamic parameters (p = 0.033). For flow rate, standard deviation decreased from 14.7% (3T) to 2.8% (3T SR), but mean values showed larger deviation after SR processing. Regarding WSS, qualitative improvements were observed, but quantitative comparisons did not show significant difference (p = 0.20). Our results suggest that SR processing stabilizes flow rate estimates and improves intraluminal hemodynamic statistics. But applying SR on data with inadequate quality may lead to larger errors. Further efforts are needed to improve generalizability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41501306What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.