Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41501282›Full record

ReviewChirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026

[What does one need to optimize the suture to turnover time?]

Jens Werner, Hanno Nieß

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jens WernerKlinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, LMU Klinikum, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, München, Deutschland. jens.werner@med.uni-muenchen.de.
Hanno NießKlinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral- und Transplantationschirurgie, LMU Klinikum, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, München, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The suture to incision time (turnover time, TOT) is a key indicator of the efficiency of perioperative care and reflects the quality of numerous preceding organizational and logistical processes. In the field of visceral surgery optimizing the turnover time poses particular challenges due to the highly variable duration of procedures, complex surgical workflows and substantial requirements for postoperative intensive monitoring capacities. This narrative review summarizes the factors described in the literature as having a relevant influence on turnover time. These include patient flow from the wards to the operating theater, operating room preparation including material and equipment availability, suitable staffing and infrastructural resources as well as the integration of unplanned interventions, such as emergencies, revision procedures and transplantations. Furthermore, organizational strategies are presented that in various studies were found to be associated with an improvement in perioperative workflows, including standardized turnover processes, lean-based approaches, parallel task execution and digital support systems. Finally, the review discusses the role of operating room management that can be centralized, decentralized or as hybrid model depending on the local structure, with a focus on coordination, prioritization and the establishment of reliable communication pathways.

Indexed as

Efficiency, OrganizationalOperating RoomsSuture TechniquesWorkflowHumansCapacity planningOperating room managementPerioperative logisticsTeam coordinationWorkflow optimization

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.