ReviewChirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026
[What does one need to optimize the suture to turnover time?]
Review in Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The suture to incision time (turnover time, TOT) is a key indicator of the efficiency of perioperative care and reflects the quality of numerous preceding organizational and logistical processes. In the field of visceral surgery optimizing the turnover time poses particular challenges due to the highly variable duration of procedures, complex surgical workflows and substantial requirements for postoperative intensive monitoring capacities. This narrative review summarizes the factors described in the literature as having a relevant influence on turnover time. These include patient flow from the wards to the operating theater, operating room preparation including material and equipment availability, suitable staffing and infrastructural resources as well as the integration of unplanned interventions, such as emergencies, revision procedures and transplantations. Furthermore, organizational strategies are presented that in various studies were found to be associated with an improvement in perioperative workflows, including standardized turnover processes, lean-based approaches, parallel task execution and digital support systems. Finally, the review discusses the role of operating room management that can be centralized, decentralized or as hybrid model depending on the local structure, with a focus on coordination, prioritization and the establishment of reliable communication pathways.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41501282What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.