ArticleScientific reports2026
Accurate quantification of steps from multiple smartphone positions.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A key challenge in smartphone-based assessment of motor capacity is that patients may wear their smartphone in varying positions, while state-of-the-art algorithms have not been designed and validated for multiple device locations. This paper proposes a solution to estimating foot-to-ground initial contacts (ICs) during gait using inertial measurement unit (IMU) sensor data collected from a smartphone agnostic of its location in a cloth front or back pocket. FAIR-Q, an algorithm originally validated for data collected from the lower trunk was further tuned for this intended use, and tested on IMU data collected in cloth pocket positions from both healthy adults (n = 83, age range: 20–83 y.o.) and people with Multiple Sclerosis (n = 50, age range: 22–61 y.o., EDSS score: 0–6) during a 30s walk test. The performance of FAIR-Q was compared against a gold standard multi-sensor device in terms of sensitivity and measurement error in identifying ICs and measuring step and stride durations. Excellent performance was achieved for both groups in all tested conditions (test-level relative errors for duration measures < 1%) and using data from a large variety of smartphone devices, supporting the method’s suitability for high-frequency smartphone-based assessment of gait capacity in neurological diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.