ArticleScientific reports2026
Footprint morphology sheds light on running strategies in non-avian theropods.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study analyzes two trackways of the fastest running theropods in the fossil record, offering a rare opportunity to examine dinosaur biomechanics during high-speed locomotion. We focus on the distinct three-dimensional morphologies of footprints-La Torre 6B-01 and La Torre 6A-14 (Early Cretaceous, La Rioja, Spain)-produced by similar theropod trackmakers on the same surface. The La Torre 6B-01 footprints range from digitigrade to subdigitigrade, whereas the La Torre 6A-14 tracks vary from fully digitigrade to digitigrade with an elongated metatarsophalangeal area. These differences are interpreted as reflecting distinct phases of running locomotion, likely linked to changes in trackmaker behavior. Comparable morphologies occurred in other trackways that have been interpreted as produced by running trackmakers, from the Early Jurassic to the Late Cretaceous. These examples emphasize how different phases of a run-combined with variations in force exertion and autopodium positioning-can strongly influence footprint morphology. Our findings reveal that theropod dinosaurs employed running strategies more complex and dynamic than previously recognized. Subtle footprint features, such as the presence or absence of metatarsophalangeal impressions, can be directly tied to changes in posture, weight distribution, and muscular activity. This approach provides new perspectives on biomechanical evolution, showing that locomotor diversity and limb morphology shaped dinosaur adaptation and diversification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.