ArticleScientific reports2026
A compact circularly polarized ultra-wide bandwidth implantable antenna for multiple scenarios.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This paper presents a novel compact ultra-wide bandwidth circularly polarized implantable antenna. It serves biomedical applications in the industrial, scientific, and medical bands (2.4–2.4835 GHz) as well as in the mid-field band (1.824–1.98 GHz). Its overall size is reduced to 0.0364λ0 × 0.0364λ0 × 0.0023λ0 (λ0 denotes the free-space wavelength at the minimum operational frequency of the antenna) by means of a meander-type radiating surface, a loaded short-circuit probe, and a defective ground structure. An Ultra-wide impedance bandwidth (69.4%, 1.37–3.07 GHz) and an axial ratio bandwidth (34.7%, 1.78–2.63 GHz) are achieved while maintaining antenna miniaturization. A fabricated prototype tested in minced pork exhibits a measured impedance bandwidth of 60.8% (1.23–2.72 GHz) and an effective axial ratio bandwidth of 35.1% (1.70–2.56 GHz). The antenna achieves gains of − 20.05 dBi and − 18.75 dBi at 1.9 GHz and 2.45 GHz, respectively. The effects of different human tissue models and implantation sites on the radiation characteristics of the antenna are discussed to assess the stability and generalizability of its performance. It is shown that the antenna can fulfil different application scenarios in the human body. Moreover, the peak SAR levels remain within the permissible thresholds specified by the IEEE C95.1-2005 guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.