Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41501237›Full record

ReviewMikrochimica acta2026

Wearable technology for athletes: material innovations, performance monitoring, and emerging paradigms.

Wei Li, Jiawei Feng, Guomin Feng, Shuolei Feng

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Mikrochimica acta, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Wei LiDepartment of Physical Education, Guangzhou Huali College, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 511325, China.
Jiawei FengSchool of Physical and Health Education, East China Jiaotong University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, 330013, China.
Guomin FengDepartment of Physical Education, Guangdong AIB Polytechnic, Guangzhou, Guangdong, 511365, China.
Shuolei FengLincoln University College, Petaling Jaya, 47301, Malaysia. feng_shuolei@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the popularity of marathons increases globally, understanding the implications of these innovations on athlete performance and health becomes crucial. Wearable technology has emerged as a pivotal tool for monitoring physiological parameters, optimizing training loads, and preventing injuries, thereby enhancing overall performance. Furthermore, advancements in athletic wear materials can significantly improve comfort and efficiency, potentially reducing the risk of musculoskeletal injuries during training and competition. The article also discusses the physiological impacts of marathon running, including the effects on joint health and cardiovascular recovery, highlighting both the benefits and risks associated with long-distance running. By synthesizing current research, the review identifies key challenges, such as the need for individualized training regimens and technology integration into traditional training practices. This article aims to provide a comprehensive overview of how wearable technology and material innovations can be leveraged to enhance the marathon experience for athletes while also addressing the associated health considerations.

Indexed as

AthletesAthletic PerformanceMarathon RunningMonitoring, PhysiologicWearable Electronic DevicesHumansEthical considerationsMarathon sportsPerformance monitoringSensor accuracyWearable technology

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.