ArticleScientific reports2026
Age distribution of high-risk HPV infection and cervical lesions in an unvaccinated adult Brazilian population within an organized screening program.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Associations between vaginal microecological status and high-risk human papillomavirus positivity in women from Eastern China: a retrospective cross-sectional study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
High-risk human papillomavirus (hr-HPV) persistent infection is the necessary cause of cervical cancer, yet age-specific prevalence patterns in unvaccinated adult women remain insufficiently characterized in Brazil. This population-based study describes the distribution of hr-HPV infection and cervical lesions among 20,398 women aged 25–64 years screened during the first screening round of the PREVENTIVO organized program using HPV-DNA testing in Indaiatuba, Brazil (2017–2022). Overall hr-HPV prevalence was 12.8% (95% CI: 12.4–13.1), with a bimodal age pattern: a first peak at 25–26 years (26%) and a smaller second peak at 55–56 years (11.2%). HPV16, HPV18, and 12 other hr-HPV types were detected in 2.63%, 1.01%, and 10.72% of women, respectively, all showing significant age-related declines. Among hr-HPV positive women, 12.4% had CIN2+, including 29 cervical cancers. CIN2 + rates ranged from 11 to 17% between ages 25–49, decreased after, and showed a late HSIL peak at 61 years (8.2%). Cervical cancer peaked at 45–46 years, with no cases after age 55, reflecting the impact of early precursor detection within the program. These findings demonstrate a persistent burden of hr-HPV and high-grade lesions at older ages and provide essential baseline data for monitoring vaccination impact. They also support consideration of extended of screening strategies, including a potential hr-HPV “exit test” beyond age 64.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.