ArticleScientific reports2026
A comparative study of loss functions and attention mechanisms in landslide semantic segmentation using U-Net.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Advancement in landslide detection can be largely attributed to the introduction of deep learning, particularly semantic segmentation. Susceptible regions can be identified using satellite imagery and Digital Elevation Model (DEM) data. This study explores multi-modal data to improve the identification and detection of landslides. The U-Net model serves as a baseline that is further enhanced by the introduction of an attention mechanism that refines pixel-level predictions. Evaluation of various loss functions resulted in increased performance optimization. The Bijie landslide dataset, featuring high-resolution satellite images, DEM data, and ground truth masks, was used for training and evaluation. Precision, recall, F1 score, accuracy, mean intersection over union (mIoU), and Area Under the Curve (AUC) were metrics used to evaluate the performance. The model incorporating the attention mechanism achieved the highest mIoU of 0.76, F1 score of 0.74, and accuracy of 0.94, surpassing the base model. Attention mechanisms concentrate on critical regions and thus improve feature extraction by enhancing segmentation precision. The integration of multi-modal data and diverse loss functions contributes to better landslide detection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.