Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41501220›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

A comparative study of loss functions and attention mechanisms in landslide semantic segmentation using U-Net.

Vibha B Hegde, S Girisha, Dasharathraj K Shetty, P Sughosh, Balakrishna S Maddodi, G Savitha, Jayaraj Mymbilly Balakrishnan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Vibha B HegdeManipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.
S GirishaManipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.
Dasharathraj K ShettyManipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India. raja.shetty@manipal.edu.
P SughoshDepartment of Civil Engineering, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.
Balakrishna S MaddodiDepartment of Civil Engineering, Manipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.
G SavithaManipal Institute of Technology, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.
Jayaraj Mymbilly BalakrishnanDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advancement in landslide detection can be largely attributed to the introduction of deep learning, particularly semantic segmentation. Susceptible regions can be identified using satellite imagery and Digital Elevation Model (DEM) data. This study explores multi-modal data to improve the identification and detection of landslides. The U-Net model serves as a baseline that is further enhanced by the introduction of an attention mechanism that refines pixel-level predictions. Evaluation of various loss functions resulted in increased performance optimization. The Bijie landslide dataset, featuring high-resolution satellite images, DEM data, and ground truth masks, was used for training and evaluation. Precision, recall, F1 score, accuracy, mean intersection over union (mIoU), and Area Under the Curve (AUC) were metrics used to evaluate the performance. The model incorporating the attention mechanism achieved the highest mIoU of 0.76, F1 score of 0.74, and accuracy of 0.94, surpassing the base model. Attention mechanisms concentrate on critical regions and thus improve feature extraction by enhancing segmentation precision. The integration of multi-modal data and diverse loss functions contributes to better landslide detection.

Indexed as

Attention mechanismDigital elevation modelsGradCAMLandslide detectionSemantic segmentationU-Net++

Identifiers

PMID41501220
PMCPMC12808770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.